Department of Clinical Neurosciences

DCNS AI Retreat

DCNS Post-Retreat Evaluation

You can skip questions that aren’t relevant to you.

Please rate the following on a 1–5 scale (1 = Strongly disagree, 5 = Strongly agree), unless otherwise specified.

Your Name (optional)
Overall feedback
Strongly disagreeDisagreeNeutralAgreeStrongly agree
The retreat met my expectations for relevance for Department of Clinical Neurosciences members.
There was an appropriate amount of content related to research.
There was an appropriate amount of content related to education.
There was an appropriate amount of content related to clinical care.
I gained practical knowledge I can apply in my academic or clinical work.
The sessions improved my understanding of AI capabilities and limitations in healthcare, research and education.
The retreat increased my confidence in engaging with AI tools or initiatives.
The level of content was appropriate for my career stage and role.
The retreat fostered meaningful discussion and interdisciplinary engagement.
The AI-scribe demonstration and applied examples were useful and informative.
What is one concrete idea or action you plan to take as a result of this retreat?
What is one suggestion to improve future department retreats?
Are there other AI topics you would like to cover in future DCNS rounds?
Feel free to add any additional comments you would like to share about the retreat.
Dr. Jessalyn Holodinsky — Assistant Professor (Data Science), Departments of Emergency Medicine, Community Health Sciences and Clinical Neurosciences; Director, Artificial Intelligence & Data Education and Ethics; Office of Faculty Development; University of Calgary
Strongly disagreeDisagreeNeutralAgreeStrongly agree
The content of the talk was clear, relevant, and well-structured.
The speaker’s communication and delivery were effective and engaging.
The talk provided practical or intellectual value for my work in the Department of Clinical Neuroscience.
Dr. Brandon Westover — Emily Fisher Landau Professor of Neurology, Harvard Medical School & MIT
Strongly disagreeDisagreeNeutralAgreeStrongly agree
The content of the talk was clear, relevant, and well-structured.
The speaker’s communication and delivery were effective and engaging.
The talk provided practical or intellectual value for my work in the Department of Clinical Neuroscience.
Dr. Aravind Ganesh — Associate Professor, Neurology; Vice Chair EDIA, Department of Clinical Neurosciences; University of Calgary
Strongly disagreeDisagreeNeutralAgreeStrongly agree
The content of the talk was clear, relevant, and well-structured.
The speaker’s communication and delivery were effective and engaging.
The talk provided practical or intellectual value for my work in the Department of Clinical Neuroscience.
Dr. Mike Weldon — Emergency Physician, Alberta Health Services
Strongly disagreeDisagreeNeutralAgreeStrongly agree
The content of the talk was clear, relevant, and well-structured.
The speaker’s communication and delivery were effective and engaging.
The talk provided practical or intellectual value for my work in the Department of Clinical Neuroscience.
Dr. Soroush Sabbaghan — Associate Professor, Werklund School of Education; GenAI Educational Leader in Residence; University of Calgary
Strongly disagreeDisagreeNeutralAgreeStrongly agree
The content of the talk was clear, relevant, and well-structured.
The speaker’s communication and delivery were effective and engaging.
The talk provided practical or intellectual value for my work in the Department of Clinical Neuroscience.
Dr. Eric Smith — Professor, Neurology; Deputy Head, Clinical Neurosciences; University of Calgary and Alberta Health Services
Strongly disagreeDisagreeNeutralAgreeStrongly agree
The content of the talk was clear, relevant, and well-structured.
The speaker’s communication and delivery were effective and engaging.
The talk provided practical or intellectual value for my work in the Department of Clinical Neuroscience.
Dr. Garnette Sutherland — Professor, Neurosurgery; Lead, neuroArm Medical Robotics Program; University of Calgary
Strongly disagreeDisagreeNeutralAgreeStrongly agree
The content of the talk was clear, relevant, and well-structured.
The speaker’s communication and delivery were effective and engaging.
The talk provided practical or intellectual value for my work in the Department of Clinical Neuroscience.
Dr. Sean Dukelow — Professor, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation; Section Chief, PM&R; University of Calgary and Alberta Health Services
Strongly disagreeDisagreeNeutralAgreeStrongly agree
The content of the talk was clear, relevant, and well-structured.
The speaker’s communication and delivery were effective and engaging.
The talk provided practical or intellectual value for my work in the Department of Clinical Neuroscience.
Ms. Leeanne Morrow — Associate University Librarian, Student Learning and Engagement; University of Calgary
Strongly disagreeDisagreeNeutralAgreeStrongly agree
The content of the talk was clear, relevant, and well-structured.
The speaker’s communication and delivery were effective and engaging.
The talk provided practical or intellectual value for my work in the Department of Clinical Neuroscience.